Consequentialism about the virtues offers a potentially more informative alternative. Which theory influences your everyday life the most. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism, virtue ethics, and pragmatic ethics. In this terminology, action is more important than the consequences. Kantian consequentialism has been added to your cart add to cart. According to the kantian, what are really good or bad are not the consequences of our actions, but the actions themselves. Kantian normative theories abound, but most share a rejection of consequentialist normative principles and an emphasis on the importance of autonomy. Differences between consequentialism and kantianism. Utilitarianism, kantian ethics, natural rights theories.
Agency, identity, and integrity, christine korsgaard does a wonderful job developing her kantian account of normativity and the rational necessity of morality. While kant himself was not a consequentialist, cummiskey thinks he should have been, given his fundamental positions in ethics. Standard interpretations see kant as rejecting all forms of consequentialism, and defending a theory which is fundamentally dutybased and. The leading defender of that position is immanuel kant, whose moral theory talks about how to universalize given norms without regard to their consequences. Act utilitarianism au is the moral theory that holds that the morally right action, the act. The structure of consequentialism no one can hold that everything, of whatever category, that has value, has it in virtue of its consequences. Kant says in effect that there is a moral reason to do an act when. March 29, 2014 abstract it is common in political science to assume a quasihumean picture of rational action. Cummiskeys kantian consequentialism utilitas cambridge core. Utilitarianism says that an act is morally right insofar as it maximizes total utility. Kant s treatment of utilitarianism and consequentialism further complicates the task of combining deontological and consequentialist concepts into modern liberal projects. Consequentialism this approach to ethics is based upon the aphorism, ends justify the means. Brief revision notes for kantian deontology, suitable for as a2 philosophy or religious studies students.
So, our argumentation gained persuasive power from talking about machines that are built to improve the ethical situation. Consequentialism is committed to promoting the good and theories that honour the good fail the universalisability test. A kantian view of morality, for instance, is usually thought to be opposed to consequentialism, if any is. Korsgaards rejection of consequentialism david cummiskey abstract.
Consequentialism and integrity 21 tialism that the only kind. Utilitarianism does not take into account rights and rules. But this new form of consequentialism, which follows from kants theory, has a distinctly kantian tone. Consequentialism does not take into account the morally relevant difference between acts and omissions 4. In this way, the rule consequentialist can ensure that there will be rules pertaining to non. The leading defender of that position is immanuel kant, whose moral theory talks about how to universalize given norms without regard to. Through scrupulous analysis of kants writings and exhaustive consideration of recent scholarship on kant, cummiskey demonstrates that the foundations of kantian thought are the basis for an enriched understanding of moral principles and values. Consequentialism and kantianism are two opposing concepts that fall under normativeethics that deals with such questions as rightness or wrongness of an action. Korsgaard, selfconstitution, integrity, kantian ethics, rationalism, consequentialism. Kant infamously argued that it would be wrong to lie. Nonconsequentialist utilitarianism bypar nir eyal harvard university and harvard medical school abstract ethics 101 students read that utilitarianism is a version of consequentialism.
Environmental studies and utilitarian ethics brian g. Varieties of consequentialism bibliography philpapers. Deontology and consequentialism are related in the sense that both can be used in the decisionmaking process, however, they differ from each other. I \the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people i the greatest happiness principle \actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they. Thus consequentialism postulates that a person faced with moral dilemma, should chose an action that produces best consequences. Kant himself believed that kantian foundations supported a deontological rather than a consequentialist normative theory. The opposition is rather between virtue ethics and kantian ethics on the one hand and consequentialism on the other.
Korsgaards account of normativity, however, has received its fair share of attention. Kantian consequentialism argues that kants basic rationalist, internalist approach to the justification of normative principles, his conception of morality as a system of categorical imperatives, his account of the nature of the goodwill and the motive of duty, and his principle of universalizability are all compatible with normative consequentialism. So, our argumentation gained persuasive power from talking about machines that are built to. From this viewpoint, the morality of an action is based on. Most political philosophers recognize, for example, that even though it is fairly easy to be consequentialist and not utilitarian, it is.
Rational action and explanatory consequentialism don tontiplaphol. This section, while a good start, was too focused on reconciling consequentialism with other moral theories including blatantly false ideas of kantian ethics, which is not the subject of this page, but is still the paradigmatic example of deontological ethics. A consequentialist believes a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome, or consequence. Environmental ethicists have focused much attention on the limits of. A final section traces a recent history of the use of nonconsequentialist utilitarianism, explaining how the present notion of nonconsequentialist utilitarianism differs from will kymlickas and daniel jacobsons notions. A different proposal has been made by michael ridge. Utilitarianism, kantian ethics, natural rights theories, and. Although the term consequentialism is a recent coinage it appears to have first been used in its present sense by anscombe it refers to a type of theory which has a long history. Consequentialism and deontology bibliography philpapers.
In kantian consequentialism, david cummiskey argues that the central ideas of kants moral philosophy provide claims about value which, if applied consistently, lead to consequentialist normative principles. Deontology, consequentialism, and utilitarianism kantian ethics is along the same lines as deontology. Consequentialism essay sample even though deontology and consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. If kant is correct, then it would seem that utilitarianism, and any other consequentialist normative principle, is misguided. The opposite of consequentialism is, unsurprisingly, nonconsequentialism, although this could also be labeled as deontological ethics.
Kantian normative theories abound, but most share a rejection of consequentialist normative principles and an emphasis on the importance of. If that were so, one would just go on for ever, and there would be an obviously hopeless regress. I am learning about these three theories now and i feel a lot of sympathy towards consequentialism, specifically rule utilitarianism. Now, we are not suggesting that its impossible to understand consequentialism in a. On this picture, an action is rational if and only if it is such as to be caused by a rationalizing set of mental states. Jean thomas abstract this article analyzes hybrid philosophical models that combine deontological and consequentialist principles. Moral philosophers have often grappled with defining rights and duties without looking to the overall consequences of certain rules. One reason that is commonly put forward to justify this opposition is that they take different moral.
Consequentialism does not take into account special obligations to special people 5. The good will intentions count and the only intention that counts is the good will. Consequentialism i consequentialism in ethics is the view that whether or not an action is good or bad depends solely on what e ects that action has on the world. In kantian consequentialism, david cummiskey argues that the central ideas of kants moral philosophy provide claims about value which, if applied.
Kant and consequentialism reflections on cummiskeys kantian consequentialism in his article, the author considers possible forms of relationship between kant s ethics and consequentialism. Jul 03, 20 consequentialism and integrity bernard williams 1. And they disagree on whether there is just one ranking of outcomes that is the same for all agents agent. Virtue ethics, kantian ethics and consequentialism introduction contemporary theories of virtue ethics are often presented as theories that are in opposition to kantian ethics and consequentialist ethics. Consequentialism routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Virtue ethics, kantian ethics and consequentialism introduction. Tonkens 2009 consequentialist ethics do not seem to suffer from such value propagation problems. Consequentialists disagree on whether we should assess the normative statuses of actions directly in terms of how their outcomes rank actconsequentialism or indirectly in terms of whether, say, they comply with the code of rules with the highestranked associated outcome ruleconsequentialism, motiveconsequentialism, etc. Hedonistic utilitarianism is the paradigmatic example of a consequentialist moral theory. The defining feature of consequentialism is that it ranks outcomes the outcomes associated with acts, sets of rules, sets of motives, or something else and then takes the normative statuses of actions to be some increasing function of how those outcomes rank. First, since consequentialist principles may require unacceptable sacrifices of some for the benefit of others, consequentialist principles do not. Pdf kant and consequentialism reflections on cummiskeys. The term deontological was first used to describe the current, specialised definition by c. Kant s ethics so far in our discussion of ethics we have been focusing on different versions of consequentialism the view that one is morally obliged to pursue the course of action which, of the available alternatives, will produce the best outcome.
Kantian deontology revision notes teaching resources. Korsgaards account of normativity, however, has received its fair share of. It follows that a conscientious kantian moral agent may be required to sacrifice the innocent because it will promote the good. Even though deontology and consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. For more than two decades, christine korsgaard has been developing a remarkably clear and comprehensive account of kants moral theory. Wolff university of minnesota conservation biology program,100 ecology building 1987 upper buford circle, st. An analysis of consequentialism and deontology in the normative ethics of the bhagavadgita. Utilitarianism, kantian ethics, natural rights theories, and religious ethics a utilitarian argument, in the strict sense, is one what alleges that we ought to do something because it will produce more total happiness than doing anything else would. Pdf in his article, the author considers possible forms of relationship between kants ethics and consequentialism. Consequentialism, egoism, and the moral law bates college. Consequentialism and constraints consequentialist theories have two elements. Criticisms of consequentialism and kantian ethics may. Consequentialism builds on what may seem to be the merest truism, namely that morality is concerned with making the world a better place for all. Kant calls rules which say what we ought to do imperatives.
Virtue ethics, kantian ethics and consequentialism. According to kant, a good will is a will that chooses a certain action because it is the action dictated by duty. Indeed, we shall see that the most natural kantian interpretation of the demand to respect persons generates a form of consequentialism. In this context, he analyses david cummiskeys views which are expressed in his book, kantian consequentialism 1996. Kantians and consequentialists alike have presumed that kantian ethics is incompatible with all forms of consequentialism, and that it. In addition, there are several common objections to consequentialism that must be addressed. To understand his view of the good will, we therefore need to understand what duty is. Thus the right action of an agent, in a particular circumstance is that action among alternative actions that produces over all best result. Positive consequentialism demands that we bring about good states of affairs, whereas negative consequentialism may only require that we avoid bad ones. According to many kantians, consequentialism is inadequate for two related reasons. The choice between consequentialist and kantian ethics is a dif. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths.
Consequentialism and integrity 21 tialism that the only. Pdf kant and consequentialism reflections on cummiskey. Hybrid approaches to political and moral obligation are particularly appealing to moral realists because they enable policymakers to. However, the introduction goes on to treat consequentialism as involving the production of optimal consequences and the possibility of consequentialist moral satisficing is never mentioned. While there are certainly other versions, consequentialism achieves its most auspicious presentation through john stuart mills hedonic actutilitarianism. Similarly, it is questionable whether creating a kantian machine is actually kantian. Deontology consequentialism and utilitarianism kantian. In consequentalist ethics, the morality or immorality of an action is determined by the outcome of that action. Roughly speaking, consequentialist theories of virtue explain a character traits status as a virtue or vice by appealing to the value of the consequences of the trait, unlike the dominant aristotelian and kantian views according to. The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist viewthat morality requires promoting the good of alland a belief that the rights of the individual place significant constraints on what may be done to help others. The central problem for normative ethics is the conflict between a consequentialist viewthat morality requires promoting the good of alland a belief that the rights of the individual place. The moral value of an action does not depend on the realization of the object of the action but merely on the principle of the volition by which the action is done irrespective of the objects of the facility of desire. The former two are concerned with, respectively, the development of a virtuous character and a good will, whereas consequentialism is essentially a doctrine that just provides a justification of the right option without. First, consequentialism has been widely criticized for the subordination of rights and duties to the maximization of the good.
507 1422 123 1421 401 433 1302 386 568 659 433 259 731 182 64 636 1267 1314 289 1092 621 911 179 971 1045 1542 895 289 1144 1229 1589 1278 1160 394 684 888 791 261 659 261 1301 451 906 685 1176 501